You know what really grinds my gears? The Gears Strike Back

That must be handy for rules.

Apart from the shade of Government, has much changed in the c13 years since this? (and I appreciate that the mods don’t want a politics thread but this was literally the first post!)

It got a lot worse for a while, then recently, slightly better.

It went from a very deep, dark blue to a ever-so-slightly lighter shade of blue.

Whilst there is a bit of a difference regarding Johnson, is there really much water separating Cameron & Starmer?

I think the main difference is that Cameron & Osborne (as much they weren’t my type of Tories) were quite up front about the need for difficult decisions, before the election, whereas Starmer can’t stop gaslighting us.

Then there’s the creeping authoritarianism, which is more reminiscent of late Blair than Cameron.

And Cameron could speak quite well and present his ideas with enthusiasm.

Finally, he was in control of his own party (as much as that wasn’t to my taste), so they didn’t make his chancellor cry.

2 Likes

Up to a point, I think he misjudged Brexit terribly, thinking a (remain) vote would silence the Europhobes once and for all. That said he was also given a difficult hand to play. The EU could have compromised a little.

2 Likes

He successfully got the party behind him with the commitment to a referendum. It was the public he misjudged.

1 Like

More a case of proper referendum “rules” weren’t instigated.

Switzerland uses them a lot for “county” stuff / national issues. Simplified, their rules require a double figure majority vote, county majority, & also a minimum participation level (higher than 40%) for modifications to the constitution.

On the same rules, the UK referendum on leaving the UK would have passed on participation (72%) but failed on a 4% majority. The Swiss protocols require a majority of 'counties" - the UK vote was geographically split in that respect. Dunno what the overall count was.

Some of my UK work colleagues - “I do see some some areas where the EU is beneficial, so overall I think we should remain, but I’ll vote leave just to show my displeasure in other areas.” :man_facepalming:

2 Likes

My boss voted leave and now has to do significantly more paperwork when we send pallets to Europe, along with other new admin.

He regularly says he regrets it massively and would vote the other way in a heart beat now.

Well, as an aviation company that bounced all over the EU (& world) with very simple cross-border protocols, you would have thought that some of my ex-colleagues would have had more sense. Never mind the cross-border trade that was generated by all the business people we flew around.

When they are taking 2+ hrs to get through some EU Border Control points, they are regretting their vote!

The referendum result went to Parliament and a 2:1 majority of MPs approved it.

1 Like

Yeah but you can’t change the rules after you’ve seen the result

2 Likes

Placing such rules on the referendum would have quite rightly been seen as a blatant attempt to skew it favour of one result (remain) over the other (leave).

If 17 million people voted to leave — the largest vote for anything in the history of British democracy — and we hadn’t left because of such rules, do you seriously think that would’ve been the end of it?

I strongly suspect Cameron would’ve lost his majority through defections to whatever party Nigel Farage was leading at the time, who would’ve subsequently won an early election before 2020.

Edit: That’s not to say the referendum couldn’t have been done better. Shaping what Brexit would look like with a multiple choice pre-referendum, then having a straight yes / no referendum on the winner of that poll, might have made post-referendum politics somewhat less chaotic (and Brexiteers who didn’t like the flavour of Brexit chosen might have voted no, as happened with the New Zealand flag referendum).

It would have been easier to retire majorities in each of the nations. Like the Ozzies do with states.

You can if you win.

I distinctly remember there being talk of things like remaining in the single market even if we left, or exploring a Norway option.
All such chat immediately ended as soon as leave won.

1 Like

But all these alternative dream solutions had one major flaw!!

They relied on the EU agreeing to them.
PDT_Xtremez_24

An they were quite happy to make us squeal to make sure no one else thought it might be a good idea

Ribbon cables. Trying to install an additional drive in my laptop and can’t get the fiddly… thing attached.

Not really, it would have been very easy to relate to other countries, how they ran their referenda & add some parameters based on best working practices.

It was all in there to start with!! - why can’t i get it back in with the new bits

I am sure it is some kind of magic - maybe a laptop case is like the tardis once you close it!

1 Like

Again, allowing potentially a couple of million Scots to have a veto over 17 million voters would have been seen — quite rightly — as vote rigging and would not have been the end of it. I refer you to my earlier comments about the Cameron administration collapsing and the subsequent election being handed to Farage.

And how do you suppose the 17 million people, having been denied what they voted for, would have subsequently voted? Bear in mind the massive majority Starmer ‘achieved’ with 9 million voters.

1 Like