Got there in the end.
Just one provider or will they split it up, one in the north, one in the midlands and one on the south
1 Like
And excellent lesson in saying the word āpauseā without saying the word āpauseā.
For a flagship program you have got to love the forward planning
Current contract ended Mar 23 - tendering process ongoing and replacement supplier to be named in due course - then the obvious delays in getting course/standards etc approved
Apr 24 anyone? Shall we start a book or sweepstake?
4 Likes
November 2023
Standard public sector
this is exactly my thought and what i implied in my earlier post (#26) - what are the chances of those O18s who have been awarded the scholarship actually seeing itā¦the irony is those who missed out being U18 will be the first eligible by the time comes around!
It would be mighty awkward if we limited applicants to O18 and then delayed until the first batch aged outā¦
3 Likes
But entirely unsurprising.
2 Likes
If those cadets donāt get to use their scholarship because we screwed up the contract I can see legal action on the horizon.
2 Likes
you mean like a repeat of the DofE situation where parent kicked up a fuss and the organisation paid for the child to complete the exped via other means??
it would be an interesting precedent if set as āother meansā would be a ānon-serviceā aircraft that wasnāt an approved supplierā¦
5 Likes
Third hand information, so dunno how accurate, but is seems possible that a variety of āauditā factors (ISO standards, etc) were carried out as part of the tendering process - the bidding trg organisations were apparently visited in advance.
If correct, hopefully that will reduce the overall timeframe to get the successful bidder up & running.
Vested interest - one of our cadets will be going to the new provider!
I hear tented accommodation may be an optionā¦
1 Like
Fingers crossed, but my money is on a lengthy delay due to a legal challenge brought about by an unsuccessful bidder.
Another flight school gone bust today 
https://flyer.co.uk/shorehams-fta-flight-school-closes-with-students-owed-money/
Shoreham was massive!
1 Like
ā¦and then hey would qualify for the C wings !
Good plan 
Very very interesting article in the latest paper edition of Flight Training News.
FTN alleges that there were some suspicious financial moves made by Tayside Aviationās owner, Tony Banks in the weeks before its closure, meaning when the dust settles, he wonāt be out of pocket.
In a further twist, Tony Banks has filed a legal action against James and Kathleen Watt, the previous owners until Dec 2021, and reported them to the CAA for āfalsification of aircraft maintenance recordsā prior to the sale. The CAA is currently investigating a number of the ex-Tayside engineers in regard to the offences.
Essentially, cadets have been flying in unsafe aircraft at Tayside for a number of years!!!
I can only begin to imagine how unsafe all the other ATOās up and down the country must be if āfalsification of aircraft maintenance recordsā was going on within an organisation that was so closely monitored by the MOD, RAF and RAFAC. The only one in the country to be approved in fact.
The fact that Tayside was awarded the ACPS contract renewal beggars belief!
Pin well and truly pulled!
3 Likes
Holy moly.
I do wonder what the 22 Gp process is to sign off a centre to deliver flying IAW our current policy. Clearly the process isnāt great if what is being claimed turns out to be true.
I think the only people who actually believe that the RAF are the best in the business are the RAF.
Itās becoming very apparent that managing airworthiness, and contract monitoring are not the RAFs strongest pointsā¦
7 Likes