You can argue the logotype for the R pushes the centre point, but the R starting too far left is less noticeable then the A not being centred. The kerning from the A to the F is greater than the R to the A, so theoretically that’s balanced out.
Although, it doesn’t matter if your A is centred if you can’t see it, I suppose.
Then we get to the bird - the wings are closer to one edge than the other.
I could do better in GIMP, and that’s really not the right tool for the job.
Were actual graphic and textile designers involved in this? Did someone with eyes sign off the design and sample run?
I had a Cadet who had one leg shorter than the other, he had to wear a shoe that had a sole 5cm thicker. He was bollocked by a brainless WO who told him he had an eye for detail and those shoes aren’t correct dress. I was about to jump in an put said WO back in his box, but the Cadet got thier first “I can take them off Sir, but I’ll stuggle with the Left Wheel so can we make it Right wheels instead”. WO got back in his own box and shut the F up for the rest of the day.
I just realised that the new TRFs are actually unique.
For the first time, given the private purchase ban, we actually have an officially-issued piece of greens-specific uniform. Surely that strengthens the argument for MTP to become official RAFAC issue?
you will also find if you look that CIs have an armband to wear and a lab coat available to them, and also a CI broach style badge.
I have only seen the armband and badge (I have mine from when I was issued). since the adoption of the “CI uniform” (polo and jumpers) i haven’t seen CIs wear the badge - they now use the branded clothing as their identifier.
the armband I did see worn a few times in No3s as a highlight they were CIs and thus the reason they did not have a beret but this is on fewer occasions than I would need to a full hand to count upon.
the coat however is something of myth and legend…never seen it.
there is a long list of what CFAVs are entitled to be issued, none of which i ever received!