I met one last year. I was on a course last year (not flying-related) and in conversation with a group of colleagues, a RAFAC sergeant from a separate course(also not flying-related) sidled up to us and completely unprompted said, “It means Aircrew.”
“What means Aircrew?” we asked, confused.
“The eagle above the chevrons,” he replied pointing at his rank slides.
We were not talking about anything remotely related to rank slides, gliding etc. I suggested to him it was a , not an eagle, and we went back to our conversation.
Absolutely happened. I’ll swear on the life of any of my cadets (not my own children, wife wouldn’t be happy with me for that.).
If I were lying, I would have embellished it more, so upon telling him it was a , everyone rolled around with raucous laughter, including Dawn McCafferty and Carol Vorderman, who were there for some reason or another. “Ladies, lets blow this joint!” I said, and the three of us strode out, arm in arm into Carol’s waiting Xsara Picasso and we drove off into the sunset.
Having done (a long time ago) a very intensive one year cse at RAF Finningley in order to get my Sgt (Aircrew) rank confirmed, I find it rather disappointing that VGS personnel can be issued these. They are not aircrew.
Oh, it’s an albatross, not an eagle - rarely called an eagle during my service - there was a previous thread in which the less than polite term was discussed… Oh, you can even buy a tie with albatross!
I wouldn’t be surprised if some regular aircrew are not scathingly sarcastic if an RAFAC ‘aircrew’ start to become the big I am. Maybe there should have been a subtle alteration as until recently the aircrew awarded RPAS wings were different to mainstream aircrew.
And none of the experience, bearin,g presence or dignity to carry it off. To be a WO you have to have all the above qualities. I can see more than a few RAF personnel having a problem with this and going through their CoC to complain.