At the same time it’s just a stupid thing to do. From a marketing standpoint it’s not going to make Atheists or non-Christians more likely to buy an Easter Egg in any way shape or form, all it does is hand the religious nut jobs a stick to beat you with.
You can say any publicity is good publicity but in this case it’s almost certainly going to cost more sales than it generates.
The one and the same. With some dubious qualifications for a number of their “lawyers” in the Christian Legal Centre which they’re affiliated with. I’ve got such strong feelings about them that they’re on my list of automatic recusal from dealing with any cases they’re involved in so they can’t argue bias on appeal
They are, I agree, complete idiots. Reading the judicial reviews of the Guard and Battersby cases, the outcome in both cases was obvious. The judges in both cases were at pains to set out the reasons for their judgements. They are parasites (external interferes) on parents righteous want for everything to be done for their child, but sometimes they lose sight of what is best for the child. In the Battersby case, that child was a rotting husk in the bed and due to the intimidating factors, staff were at the end very reluctant to be involved with his care.
In the Evans case in Liverpool, these religious fools had even arranged for an air ambulance to transfer the child to Europe arriving from Germany, I know that the UK companies would not have touched the case. I suspect the German company would not have had the full details until they arrived at the hospital.
I’ve also been quite amused by Cadbury’s latest marketing for the creme eggs. They’re giving away money if you find an egg that is half milk chocolate and half white chocolate. All this has led to is people peeling all the foil off in the shops!