New Smoking and Drinking Policy

Sat in the pub on after a squadron night with some other staff out for a beer, two 18+ cadets from your Squadron walk in, is corps guidance applicable??

Sat in the pub after a parade night with some of the other staff members. As it’s just mates, their kids decide to come along. Their kids also happen to be cadets as well. Where would we stand?

2 Likes

No, the policy saus ‘While conductig RAFAC activity’ or ‘while attending an event representing the RAFAC’.

You can’t socialise you the staff cadets if they walk in, as that goes against ACP 4. But you don’t need to get up and leave.

As above really. Except the ACP 4 bit doesn’t apply. You’re not meeting up with cadets. You’re meeting up with your mates and their kids.

A group of (6-8) parents and the Padre, who have, for the last 4 dining in nights, met up in the pub round the couple, for a couple of pre-dinner drinks, continue the ‘tradition’ this year.

Do you flatly refuse entry, or are you pragmatic by letting them in despite knowing it’s against the rules?

I am thinking of pulling the plug on our dinner, refunding parents and cadets and sending bill to HQAC for losses incurred due to policy change.

Already takes too long and too many hoops to jump through based on last years rules - why bother
Oh its my biggest fundraiser and event of the year

1 Like

Per the rules, anyone who has had any alcohol in the 8 hours before the dinner can’t attend. So you’d have to reject them at the door :man_shrugging:

However this is completely unenforceable, and probably the stupidest and most unenforceable rule I’ve seen in a while. I can understand HQAC drawing a line and saying alcohol can’t be served at any event with cadets present. But how are we meant to enforce the 8 hour rule at a dinner? Are we meant to bretherlize our guests/parents as they arrive? :rofl:

3 Likes

The danger is this becomes and 11th Commandment situation - although its a big risk seeing as how nearly everything ends up as a picture on World Wide Web
MyEmoticons-com__beer

Maybe we’ll be provided with breathalysers to go alongside our new WBGTs too!

4 Likes

That just prompts me on something.

So if you have a church parade where cadets are parading in uniform - can they take communion?

Can Sqn padres take part in the rest of a cadet parade if they have taken communion?

Communion wine often has the reputation of being quite potent.

3 Likes

The future……the door of a Sqn dining in venue…

OC - “Mr Smith, it’s great to see you here supporting your son. However….despite the invitation letter stating that you mustn’t have consumed alcohol in the preceding 8 hours, I strongly suspect you, and your good lady wife, to have partaken of a cheeky G & T in the comfort of your own home prior to this evenings event?”

Mr Smith - “And?”

OC - “And…I am obliged to ask you to blow into this HQAC approved, Civ Com funded breathalyser!”

Mr Smith - pffffffffffffffff

OC - “keep blowing, keep blowing, STOP!”

Mr Smith - “Doris, could you hand me my inhaler please?”

OC - “Mr Smith, the breathalyser tells me that you do have a small amount of alcohol in your system, and I am therefore required - by the power invested in me by an IBN - to refuse you permission to enter these premises!”

Mr Smith - “?!?!?!?!”

OC - “If it’s any consolation……you are still below the legal drink drive limit, so you can happily drive home!”

OC - “Mr Smith…one last thing….thank you for all your fund raising efforts over the last 12 months!”

4 Likes

Will be interesting to see how CCFs apply this. School policy at my place allows two glasses of wine and a port at formal dinners provided only 6th form are present. School rules should take precedence on the school site

2 Likes

If it’s on school premises then head DDH so RC has no say.

Does give me a cunning plan forming in my head though……

1 Like

Except ACP 20 trumps all, especially items related to safeguarding. Or so it should…

1 Like

On a school premises it’s the schools safeguarding that has primacy I believe due to the Education Act so a bit difficult to trump.

CCF event are school activities I know of at least one head who pulled rank on a contingent commander & ordered a school return from a summer camp early.

3 Likes

I would say where two policies conflict when it comes to safeguarding, you’d choose the ‘stricter’ one. (For want of a better phrase)

If school policy says staff can have up to 2 glasses of wine, but RAFAC policy says you can’t have any, then you can’t have any. That way you’re not breaking either policy.

That is how it should be be. But often isn’t.

1 Like

But then the school bring out the “Aviation Club”

2 Likes

So what you’re saying is that, once again, we have a policy that hasn’t been properly thought out, with all possibilities covered?

3 Likes

With more hair?

1 Like

That will never fly

1 Like

I mean by coincident we haven’t had alcohol at Sqn Dinners for a couple of years (staff who can’t / don’t want to drink), by default the guests haven’t even.

Never once has it impacted a venue taking us on - we are up front at the very beginning with the fact we’ll have no alcohol (in fact on some occasions they’ve taken money off the total cost!), or a guest hasn’t come to the meal because we aren’t drinking.

Always been very successful.

Maybe biased because I don’t drink alcohol but I don’t see any problems whatsoever with the new policy, and for those who do enjoy an alcoholic beverage when away there is still a few caveats where you can.

I’m sure we all have stories on people (and regularly) who don’t behave with alcohol, are hung over in the mornings, or pressurise others into drinking particularly with the lower costs. It’s no surprise that they are taken a firmer worded policy because people roll their eyes and go whatever

2 Likes