Evening all
So I received my initial kitting last week.
The shirts both short and long sleeve are clearly marked MALE but have come without front pockets. At first I thought oh no I’ve been issued female shirts but then checking the back there are no pleats.
Is this a recent change in uniform?
AMW
17 March 2025 21:21
2
Yep, it’s the new standard. I hate it
1 Like
I thought so.
Why on earth have they done that?!
1 Like
AMW
17 March 2025 21:23
4
Probably cost cutting. Imagine it saves circa 50p a shirt on the extra fabric and buttons…
To me at least it looks weird when you’re the only one sans buttons, but at least it makes the ironing marginally easier?
1 Like
That’s true. I must admit ironing was a breeze.
And honestly, who uses the pockets?
It was a fun intro into uniform however when the first time wearing my blues was in front of the WWO and their entire DI crew.
AMW
17 March 2025 21:26
6
FBSKBT:
who uses the pockets?
I miss the tiny pen pocket tbh, even if we weren’t really meant to use it… (for formal stuff anyway)
1 Like
I know you added the caveat at the end but let’s not perpetuate silly myths.
1 Like
I think they meant the idea that you can’t use pockets for their clearly intended design purpose.
Pen pockets, hand warmer pockets etc.
Pockets on a long sleeve shirt were a bit too “school”.
Pockets on a short sleeve balanced it out a bit (though short sleeves are generally a bit too “dad at the neighbour’s BBQ” or “UPS”).
I think we should save more money and just roll our sleeves. You know, like the cadets do…
I put my MOD90 into my shirt pocket.
Lanyard round my neck, then tucked into my pocket, so it doesn’t flap around. I do the same in my MTP
1 Like
Surely putting it in your pocket defeats the point of having it on a lanyard around your neck…
1 Like
Anton
18 March 2025 09:50
13
Once they reach male cadets, they are going to have to do the same as female cadets with their lanyards.
AMW
18 March 2025 12:11
14
Good point, hadn’t even considered the lanyard side of things…