This is a prime example of local policy that increases the burden on individuals, why does something think they can demand an RA when HQ Policy clearly states it’s not required?
What’s the authorisation text all about, the authorisation process is clearly detailed in ACTO 10.
Does anyone else have any examples of crazy local policy?
Our Wing Training Officer has also decided that the RAFAC policy is wrong, and is limiting MOI courses to 15 years old, and Senior/Master cadets as well…
But you would have thought that ALL wexos would have realised by now that they should be LEADING the charge on making sure nonsense like this is stamped out.
After all…
If too many Sqns close after covid
Wings may well merge.
Whqs not needed
Wexos etc out of job
That requires some level of “what if” thinking and challenging those above them, by people not used to doing it. We’ve been doing this for years at work as the need to reinvent and seem to add some value is an imperative to stay in a job. Doing this at the moment.
The other thing is reduced number of Wings, reduced number of Regions not as many RHQs needed either.
I thought they HQAC were supposed to be stopping this didn’t Dawn say report these incidents to her and HQAC would define policy. But it is far from new having been in North region under Grp captain Middleton some of his if they weren’t so stupid would have been comical. One that comes to mid was I was at Hyde and Hattersely Sqn at the time he wanted to close that Sqn and Buxton Sqn down as they were built above the snow line and neither sqn had mountain leader qualified staff. Just one of many.