Ahhh. Somebody wants to grow a beard…
1 Like
Wasn’t me!
1 Like
Breach of Contract, Somebody not happy with CFC?
1 Like
Beards would more likely fall under the Equality Act, there’s no Human Right to facial hair!
1 Like
That would be against the ACO not the Wing surely?
i assume it would be because the written or spoken order is from WHQ, not Selfie Towers. it may reference Selfie Towers, but the order itself is from a local commander.
This being a national thing so it lands on the Dawninator and her people at HQAC
Being in that wing i can speculate given rumours but i dont fancy doing “career” suicide this evening
Definitley involves @MattB though.
Is it about smock hoods?
2 Likes
I was very offended with your comment about it
Is that GLAAAASTERSHOIRE speak for ‘smack heads’?
I’ve no idea, we’re from Wiltshire and Dorset.
Possible that we’re getting a little off topic though.
As written elsewhere, the Wing Region and HQ are not legal entities. So this makes it most likely that the initial purpose of the court hearing will be Auntie Dawn’s cronies accompanied by an MOD lawyer whose brief will be to highlight that the defendant must be the MOD/RAF direct and not the Wing(s).If this is accepted by the prosecutor(s), then the delay will be used to keep the matter from court by various back-room manoeuvres.
Being civil rather than criminal, this is ATC-HQ’s modus operandii.
1 Like
That’s if the complainant is willing to play ball, in this case the ACO may not own the ball.
True 
Unless it is part of a religious requirement!
Or signed off by a doctor.
“puts Mod hat back on”
It doesn’t appear there is any actual news on this topic forthcoming. I propose to lock it for now, with it being able to be reopened on request to a Mod.
Just wondering if anyone had any news on this.