Put it on sharepoint and it can get to squadrons, but relies on squadrons promulgating that info.
Put it on social media and you spread the message faster and wider, reaching more people and helping to ensure a consistent message.
Of course they need to ensure the message is accurate, but the mechanism is sound for things like this. The poster (and any similar ones) is a quick aide memoire to support policy promulgated in the usual manner. This poster in particular was initially designed to try and prevent squadrons thinking they know what they are doing but being too lazy to check directly.
i recall finding out about the pause in gliding via Social Media first (if you donât count these boards) and our Cadets news before our OC who was not as SM savvy.
likewise i found out which VGS were closing via SM first.
getting the message out is a positive, no one can adequate argue otherwise, but when the Cadets or Parents know more (and in this case know sooner) than the CFAVs is does not instill confidence, trust or a warm fuzzy feeling that being a CFAV is the right thing to doâŚ
If it was just to do ânewsâ and funnies and leave it at that, but no, people see a picture on it mainly and then misuse it, by feeling itâs OK to pick holes, abuse people etc in the picture(s).
And the number of photographs I have seen this weekend of RAF station personnel of all ranks wearing Poppies on GPJs makes me wonder about the veracity of this ânot to be worn with the GPJâ âruleâ. Or are the ones issued to regular personnel less waterproof than ours lol?
Thatâs a RAFAC only rule.
AP 1358 only says that it should not be worn with wet weather outerwear - as quoted similarly in ours so as to avoid âdamaging the waterproof materialsâ.
âŚFor some reason our man in the DCPC has taken it upon himself to include GPJ in that when rewriting it.
My guess would be because he felt that it needed further clarification and doesnât actually realise that the GPJ is not a wet weather outer garment.
Agreed - a made up rule ?
Thatâs what gets me - I know that Regular APs are not infallible and that they do have to be tweaked to cater for cadets on occasion but why do we find it necessary to take/copy an AP, or parts thereof, make them into another ârule bookâ and then fiddle about with them where there is no need? At least APs are (hopefully) written by people who know what it is about and have some grasp of the nuances of English, eg the difference between âmay wearâ and âmust wearâ, as per the original part of this thread.
Perhaps âour man in DCPCâ doesnât actually know what a GPJ is or if he does, has never worn one in the rain?
The posterâs wording is based on / copied from the actual regulations in both APs a few years ago, just not updated to the current regulations.
The GPJ thing is just unhelpful. I am fully in favour of having our regulations based on the RAF ones but amended to be suitable for our own organisation and the limitations we face. This particular change regarding âouterwearâ seems to be the opposite of that!
Personally I think they should just amend 1358 to include cadets, and they dont need to worry about writing in no 2c as its already written in for techies