Brize "attack"

A lot of secure areas have a layered system such as at least 2 fence lines (maybe partially electrified where permitted) with razor wire, patrols (& or dogs) between the 2 fence lines. Add in watch towers & suitable optical devices / motion sensors that only alert from input from a person/sized target / weight.

All very expensive & hugely reliant on (sometimes un reliant ) person-power

Claymores tend to be a good deterrent. :smiling_imp:

1 Like

How’s a really big sword going to help?

I prefer the precision of an épée…but if I don’t have one of those:

The M18A1 - 1.5 lbs of PETN + 700 ball bearings!

if you have to go non-lethal

1 Like

It’s not the sword, it’s the immortal warrior wielding it

1 Like

We can’t get hold of him, apparently HQ Safeguarding wouldn’t let him through the door…

From the Telegraph this evening.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/06/26/palestine-action-plans-strike-next-raf-bases/

Is it available anywhere not behind a pay wall?

If it goes through and they are proscribed I can see judges having to make some pretty severe examples to prevent idiocy. How long before one of them gets themselves shot by some SAC?

1 Like

You can use reader view to by pass

I didn’t realise Barnard was involved, professional activist that one.

Hmm maybe not overkill to proscribe them then. Although I do wonder if the change in tactics is as a result of that, or if it was going to happen anyway.

Barkston Heath is a relief landing ground. If they were to attack there, it’d probably be the most excitement seen at the place in decades!

Use Firefox browser, it negates some firewalls.

“A slide in the call identified three RAF bases most suitable for attack: RAF Cranwell and RAF Barkston Heath, both in Lincolnshire, and RAF Valley, in Anglesey, North Wales. It also recommended action against defence companies believed to be supplying arms to Israel, including a drone factory in Leicester.”

They’ve missed the boat here…

Oh, engine damage on the Voyagers - still being assessed - but estimated in the millions of £££.

1 Like

I’m not a lawyer but what was said in that meeting must be sedition at the very least?

The common law offence of sedition was abolished in 2009

Conspiracy to commit something something

2 Likes

Yeah, but that’s probably a civvy contractor assessment, the sort that charges a couple of grand to change a lightbulb.

1 Like

“Yeah, so”, takes long drag of cigarette
“You can’t smoke in here?”
Takes longer drag, sharp inhale of breath, whistles to himself
“What you got here is paint in the engine.”
“We know that, what’s the cost?”
“Well, Jimmy here is going to wipe it off with a selection of solvents, each acquired at well above the market rate, even if the least of them works, we’re charging you for the lot. Jimmy is a sub contractor, sub contracted about 6 times. He used to work here for you chumps, but he retired on a Friday and came back the following Monday as a ‘consultant’ where he does exactly the same job, in civvies, for a vast amount more money, while claiming his pension from you.
Just me being here to assess the ‘damage’ is costing the MOD about twenty grand an hour once all of the contracting companies take their cut. I’m also ex RAF by the way, and also a consultant.
We can’t do the work here either, it will be done in our own hangar, which is identical to this one, but thanks to an elaborate series of PFI and hire contacts, costs the MOD a truly eye watering sum of money to lease.”
“Really, all this for some paint?”
“Well, you want it done right don’t you? And Jimmy here is the expert.”
“What makes him an expert?”
“Well, in Iraq 1, young Jimmy here dropped exactly the same type of paint into a Hercules engine by accident, and because he was RAF he spent about a week scrubbing it off with white spirit, so he now has relevant experience, which we’re charging you a premium rate for.”

2 Likes

That’s because they belong to Air Tanker not the RAF, under a PFI contract.

4 people arrested over this.

A 41-year-old woman, of no fixed abode, was arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender.

The suspects aged 24, 29 and 36 are suspected of “the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, contrary to Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000”, the force said.

2 Likes