Same. Although, I totally anticipate the tribal mentality and protectionism of the upper echelons being enough for the RAF to reject it in favour of something more RAFy under the pretence that “we have different needs”… (Cost saving not being one of them)
We found some RAF blue PCS in a stores gash bin, on an annual camp.
The colour was just a slightly darker wedgewood blue, and it looked quite odd, TBH. Especially the trousers, for some reason. It looked more like a tracksuit than uniform. Plus, it didn’t have any RAF branding on, unlike the RN.
Some of the replies in that tweet indicate that the colour did nothing to hide dirt and dust, so the more practical trades spent their time looking scruffy. Maybe that reason it was dropped??
I wouldn’t worry too much, even when it does materialise cadets will be wearing combinations of old and new for 4-5 years, by which time something else will have changed.
When the existing stock runs out they’ll have to. Given the problems they seem to constantly have with the contracts I wouldn’t be surprised if that was fairly soon.
“Working dress” - That’s No 2, 2A, 2B, and 2C…
Other than needing to bring the waistband of the trousers back up to waist level, I can’t say I can think of anything particularly wrong with the current working dress.
The name badges have already been in service for some years.
But surely most people just do the sensible thing and blatantly ignore that stupid regulation and instead do as the RAF do - wear a name badge in any situation where a name badge is helpful. Such as training courses, public facing roles like recruiting, &c.