ACP20 Pers Form 1-19


#272

Like paying a bill ‘under protest’ thereby retaining the right to query it afterwards - otherwise paying it might be taken as agreement that the bill was justified.


RAFAC Volunteer agreement, again
#273

What’s one of them?!?


#274

Another way would be to write VC before your signature as explained nicely here:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-sign-your-name-without-assuming-liability-cathy-bilsky

You cannot be serious!!

Exmpa


#275

I have just been informed that the ACO has lost 15% of CFAV over 3 years, more than the ACF and CCF (Army). How is this document addressing this?
I presume the Scrambled Egg will say it is to legitimise the relationship between HQ and staff. But when you are being bullied into signing it, it doesn’t seem very legitimate!!


#276

Proof?


#277

A source senior to me, not in my Wing!


#278

According to MOD statistics, ATC CFAVs have went from 9900 in 2015 to 9910 in 2018.
However between 2013 and 2015, they went from 12080 to 9900 - a drop of 18%.


#279

The stats for 2017 - 2019 would be interesting…


#280

So no proof then.


#281

My wing now has only 37 officers for 22 sqns with one sqn having 4. Minimum for 22 sqns acordind to scale in ACP 20 is 88.


#282

How many NCOs? The uniformed roles are interchangeable for establishments. (though if be suprised if that made up the shortfall)


#283

Not 100% sure of the numbers of SNCO but I think it is fifty something or 60 something which is still well under 88.


#284

My old wing has 35 sqns and is very short of commissioned staff.Quite a few sqns are run by SNCOs and WOs


#285

Proof provided by Cadet04 (Thank you!)


#286

Aside from the losses, take these figures with a pinch of salt. I’ve got one member of staff on the books that I have asked repeatedly for the last 3 months to get removed and one of my mates has 3, whoi have been sitting there for 2 years, despite asking. He said to someone of limited intelligence ie Wing, Region and HQAC it looks like he’s got 7 staff, whereas in reality he is struggling to keep it going.
So there’s 4 to come off the numbers.

The set of figures missing for my money is ages of CFAV, broken down by gender, overall and by uniformed / non-uniformed. It would also be interesting by Wing.

The 2019 numbers will be interesting to see if they have binned people like they reckon they will.


#287

Have you submitted a Pers 1-09 or 1-15 for them?


#288

Could have but held up in the admin black hole at HQAC; know of staffwho left months ago but still nothing back from HQAC to confirm discharge…


#289

I suppose the good news is that they won’t have signed a 1-19, so should be removed shortly regardless.


#290

Given that it has taken HQ something like 9 months to action a couple of official retirals from my squadron, I am wondering how efficient they will be about clearing out the non-signers.


#291

Finally I have reluctantly submitted my forms. I wonder if I will be told that I haven’t done it and get sacked? That would be the normal admin state of affairs!