They don’t want to volunteer an additional 30 mins unpaid?
And still nothing…
That question was asked a lot. And not a peep was said about O18 changes.
Go on, ask them why they’ve ignored it as a question.
Also, this:
Unsure how true any of that is.
Valued and listened to…dont know about anyone else but i certainly dont feel listened to and certainly not valued…
Sounds like a waste of time, glad I didn’t bother…
I disagree. I’ve definitely learnt more about the plans, some of which don’t sound amazing but other bits sound like they’re on the right track.
It’s also settled some of the questions and rumours that are abound, and shows that HQAC know we do actually exist.
Agreed.
Lots of “politician speak” - lots of words to say very little - but some definite interesting points in there!
For those that have logged off - O18s now being discussed. Basically, it’s running more slowly than was planned and is being designed to ensure we meet equalities issues. The initial problem was raised with CAC from cadets.
SOunds like the O18 for all was binned by MOD as was only agreed for the current model.
Challenge of Children v Adult
I’m glad he’s covered it, and although there is no certain answer, it’s good to hear that detailed background around why there is the delay.
Haha, are we being told off for FOIs now! Hilarious!
JUST GET RID OF OVER 18s.
CUT OUR LOSSES AND THIS AREA OF ADMIN.
Memes not mentioned…
Actually a reasonable answer as to why it was delayed. Shame they couldn’t have said “hey, we planned this, but at the last minute some new information and directive from the MOD has come to light which we need to appraise and therefore revisit our ideas” in September.
“Could have been dealt with by a simple email”.
Could also have been dealt with by being more transparent, therefore FOIs not being needed.
But to be honest, that’s what this call is now doing!
Tbh, I always thought that the CFAV’s using all the tools available to them demonstrated a great resourcefulness that HQ should be proud of
TIME TO PEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
I’m glad I came and listened to all of that. I think this is a massive improvement in transparency.
There was a lot of political waffle/bs. But there was also a lot of useful insight into the background of what is going on. Although there wasn’t a lot specific changes being announced, it has answered a few things.
I agree. This is a massive step forwards. Still work to be done, but credit where credit is due, they ran this. Hopefully they’ll look for feedback and tweak it for next time