You know what really grinds my gears? The Gears Strike Back

If you contact the right people things do happen. Prime example would be when RC LaSER uploaded a load of photos from armouries around Sussex that had way too much detail about where weapons were stored and how they were stored. This was reported by a few people on here to HQAC Sy and the posts were removed very rapidly.

i recall that incident, and it had some potential serious implications.

a bunch of Cadets posing for a photo didn’t have any negative implications. it was actually a good PR photo, but it didn’t comply with the internal regulations and guidelines on photos.

i ended up speaking to those at the top but as they didn’t see the issue (as it wasn’t unsafe/dangerous) they didn’t see the point i was making…

Was this something to do with the shooting world by any chance? I’ve seen, and reported, photos previously where cadets are posing with L98s after a shoot where a number of cadets have fingers on the trigger. Although I can assume the rifles were unloaded etc it didn’t sit right with me to be showing that as a ‘PR’ photo. Bad drills. There was also no staff member in the photo which goes against the rules.

Nothing was done about the report though, as they thought it was fine…

Meanwhile, when JL posted pictures of cadets at Test with rifles, with BFAs and blank mags, someone at HQ took them massively to task about the photos being non-compliant, but the shooting regs are almost impossible to apply off the range.

To be fair they are pretty hard to apply anywhere. If I remember correctly there is a bit to the effect of ‘photos must be taken with an instructor in a way that would make them difficult to crop out’. So what do you have to do, stand in front of whoever you’re photographing?

1 Like

Yep, which is impossible to do while maintaining the safe distance either side of a blank firing weapon.

1 Like

Do you not like a face full of hot gas?

1 Like

GMG. Our offices are being restructured. We’re closing two sites and dropping everybody into the 3rd. The new policy will see a range of options for the workforce:

  • Deskless community workers,
  • Flexible workforce with 2 day a week in the office
  • Fixed 5 days a week in the office.

We’re having “pods” and “bubbles” installed rather than meeting rooms.

As a result we’re having a disproportionate number of “consultation meetings” where the workforce is being dragged away for 2 hours per session to discuss wallpaper, carpets, colour schemes, desk styles, chair types, breakout areas and lots and lots of other noise and distractions.

There are a team of 8 people currently traveling around other businesses to see how they do it and get other insights and inspiration.

In much the same way as HQAC do surveys about rebranding and CFCs, I fear the results of these consultations are going to be ignored in favour of budget and directors own preferences! But at least we’re being consulted, right.

2 Likes

My NHS trust telling us months ago to use our annual leave in order to avoid a build up like last year and now we have an email to say staffing is short and we can sell our annual leave if we are unable to use it. :man_facepalming:t2:

We and all youth groups should have been following the govt and DfE guidelines as this is what the cadets would have been exposed to and working to. Why on earth we tagged on to the NYA made no sense as it was another group interpreting what was already there.

Err the NYA worked with the Gov to keep us legal.

We are an out of school club and therefore DfE rules aren’t applicable.

The issue now is that we aren’t following anything just our own made up stuff, but evidently aren’t following these made up rules either :roll_eyes:

1 Like

I’ve said it before what can they do that is that bad? Unless you get done for something relating to children or financial misdoings, getting a disciplinary from anyone in the Air Cadets is meaningless and people are likely to say bye-bye and not just the so called chaff.

In order to have an effective disciplinary system you need to control people’s financial lives or something that adversely affects their lives. HQAC does not control our financial lives apart from a few days money and getting your spare time back would not be regarded as adversely affecting anyone’s life.

This being the key bit. I’m happy to have ‘club rules’ that might seem stricter than other ‘clubs’. But those rules have to be fairly enforced across the board.

2 Likes

Following the DfE guidelines and the general govt guidelines has nothing to with us not being a school. It has more to do with something that we all got and understood and not involving another body putting their own spin on things to give them some assumed importance.

Except the Gov had different rules for educational settings (DfE) and non Educational Settings (Us)

NYA got all their guidance signed off by the cabinet legal so that orgs were legal.

“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience”

1 Like

Your sabbatical over and you’re back arguing with your WgExo?

6 Likes

Haha, no it was more a comment on @themajor trying to win the argument above.

2 Likes

i think that is a bit extreme…

you need to be basically shoulder to shoulder with the shooter - this is as much, if not more, the photographers responsibility than those being photographed.
choose the wrong angle and the well positioned safety supervisor or coach can easily be cropped out - shots taken side on are best

1 Like

Trains and weather.

Oh. And “Do Not Travel” advice, which seems to cover everything from “travel is possible but mildly inconvenient” to “literally no way of getting anywhere”.