VR(T) Commission Change

I agree the pins were/are a little impractical however, you can have them embroidered with the RAFAC logo on them as you can with the VRT logo then there would be no need for the massive rank slides

1 Like

Are they really going to back down now though? They’ve been ramping up the rhetoric and making a big thing about how much work they’re doing to introduce it.

Mind you, I guess the official announcement will need to be tomorrow as the 1st October falls on a weekend.

It is getting very close to the wire. Bader is down tonight for “essential maintenance”. Perhaps there will be a massive upload of documents where somebody has done a find RAFVRT and replace with RAFAC.

As an aside is am still hearing whispers from people further up the food chain that it still won’t happen.

Personally I feel it will go ahead to prevent any loss of face of the snr mgt. Can’t see anybody having a meeting with HMQE2 and saying you know that CFC you agreed to well it is like this see…

2 Likes

TRF update on Ask the team on CFC page on SharePoint.
That’s a bit of a surprise… Not.

Otherwise the official supplier would be selling them.

That’s what I think. Regardless of the problems that appear to be unresolved the egos involved won’t want to delay again.

But these will look crap after a few months, put them through the wash, they’ll fade, go all shabby and look worse.

I think the term you’re looking for is distinguished…

1 Like

No, I know what I mean.

1 Like

Most VR(T) look crap and shabby - and doubtless some commercial supplier will produce a much better version in short order anyway.

Looking a bit crap for a couple of months - and overwhelmingly, looking crap away from the public - seems a small price to pay for getting rid of the pins. If it upsets you that much, have your Sqn in greens until you can get a better blue set made up…

1 Like

Only if he is scaled for greens, otherwise the rank slides are not issued…

Maybe someone made a slip :open_mouth: but they have the initial issue date as Oct 18 in the scaling table on the CFC bader page.

All of my tabs are rank braid with the VRTs sewn on, pins removed and in 18 years of being a Flt Lt, I’ve only had one VRT come off, which was doing FMS, which was rectified by an extra couple of loops of fishing line to reattach them. I did exactly the same with my ATCs when I was a WO, never had a problem at all. This was a tip I got from an old WO when I was first appointed.

I’m assuming he’ll buy some, and given the colours they won’t look so amateur.

He’ll boringly honk off about not buying stuff, but I assume that doesn’t include Persil - given how he honks off about them fading in the wash.

Had a thought…

As my service within the RAFVR(T) is ending… do I get a new service number for my CFC?

Just wondering if I need a new MOD90…

Ask the team, RC(N) is answering questions as we speak

regarding other colours, I haven’t heard back from cadet direct if they can do GPJ colours etc.

Has anyone used Combat logos for GPJ rank slides before? Just seeing where I can get some, so I don’t look weird with ones for a jumper on my GPJ.

Can’t get that at work, in for a long shift today. Anything interesting?

Anyone want to take bets on how many pages the commissions supplement of the Gazette is going to be? Will it be a list of resignations followed by a list of the same people being commissioned again or will it be a long list of transfers?

1 Like

Interesting thought. CCF Contingent Commanders are DDHs.

This will come as quite a shock to the three-thousand-odd serving members of the RNR…