Learn the red bits so you can recite them verbatim, as far as possible.
Be clear and confident in delivery.
(And yes bang bits - keep the thing pointing in a safe direction and remember that anything with a pouch needs checking with the NSPs - people have been failed over those!)
When assessing SAAI courses we look for a few things:
PAM correctness. Doesn’t have to be verbatim but should cover the correct content in the right order, no fads. (People saying clear, ease springs, during NSPs to each individual person is one that always makes me laugh)
Lesson/Classroom setup. Make sure your room layout works for you and you don’t make any faux pas like standing infront of weapons during NSPs due to room layout.
Instructor bearing. We don’t expect everyone to be a robot that can recite things, have some personality and manner but always be professional.
The lessons you go through and the demos you see at the start of the course should help you understand a lot of that.
Get confident in your TAMs and make sure you can take a quick glance if needed to understand where you are and what is next. Some teams let you hide queues and some insist you rely on masking to look at your notes. Brecon when running the regular course allow the instructor to have their TAM out and open infront of the assessors but they are only allowed a very limited number of masked glances.
As much as I agree with this, I do feel there is too much emphasis on “masking drills”.
As above, having a lesson plan or scanning the book towards the end of the lesson to check everything is covered should be fine (and is what I do in reality), but very much isn’t for assessment for some reason.
You’ve to “take a drink” or wonder behind a lecturn.
Why not just be honest: “let me just check I’ve not missed anything”.
To OP: don’t worry about word for word, but good familiarity with the first 4 lessons will help you out with weekend one.
If you’re doing it at the end of the lesson and you missed an important bit in the middle that then means going back and either re-teaching a whole drill or altering the drill in some way you’re not only wasting time but also confusing the students.
I have no issues at all with people utilising TAMs in the real world, we are volunteers and most don’t teach it enough to remember it entirely. That still shouldn’t detract from instructor credibility or knowledge though.
This is about passing a course though and that means showing a set standard of capability at that point in time.
It’s like a driving test, you do what you need to pass including the prep work and study then once you have passed you can adapt to your own environment.
I did SAA instructor courses in both regular and cadet forces: my previous qualification lapsed after two years out of regular service.
The course run by the Air Cadet training team is excellent, and the same as being on the regular service course.
We did only Pam 5 L98A2 lessons on my course, so I prepared by learning all the lessons pretty much verbatim - I taught the L85 rifle for eleven years as a JNCO in both operational and training units, so it all came back anyway.
I just made sure I kept it simple: teach exactly by the book, and get the whole book and nothing but the book in your head. Basic weapon drills need to be taught in military moron mode, like CPR or foot drill as far as I’m concerned.