Perhaphs a few hours (or whatever were deemed appropriate) per individual might be better? Rather than only one adjustment at all in the time.
That would stop me from winding up duty_pongo for example by giving him -100 karma in one go, but would still allow me to give karma points to a number of different users if I felt appropriate.
If you see what I mean.
There have been a couple of occasions where I’ve thought “that’s a good post! I’ll give you karma…oh, I can’t because I gave someone else karma an hour ago”.
Perhaphs a few hours (or whatever were deemed appropriate) per individual might be better? Rather than only one adjustment at all in the time.
That would stop me from winding up duty_pongo for example by giving him -100 karma in one go, but would still allow me to give karma points to a number of different users if I felt appropriate.
If you see what I mean.
There have been a couple of occasions where I’ve thought “that’s a good post! I’ll give you karma…oh, I can’t because I gave someone else karma an hour ago”.[/quote]
OI!!! :mad: so its you who keeps reducing it! and after i give you good karma :lol: especially as you agree with most things i say!
I actually quite like Karma, if used fairly. The only problem is where one person (or a group of people) pick on 1 member over a period of time. I’d guess that’s why a few members have extremely bad karma, but then my guess is that someone else has been given a correspondingly bad karma back… That’s karma surely??
maybe we should just reset it every so often, and maybe people will then learn to play fairly?