Whilst searching for something else entirely, I happened upon [u]this[/u]:
(My bold)
…despite EASPs still being current in ACP16, taught (as of April) in the ECOs course and clearly far more suitable for the task of running a deployed exercise, does this mean we should actually be using an EAM?
[quote=“MattB” post=24828]Whilst searching for something else entirely, I happened upon this:
(My bold)
…despite EASPs still being current in ACP16, taught (as of April) in the ECOs course and clearly far more suitable for the task of running a deployed exercise, does this mean we should actually be using an EAM?[/quote]
An EASP is if you’re running a full Ex (with or without) B&P whereas an EAM is more appropriate if you’re running a series of ‘stands’ or individual BE’s.
[quote=“MattB” post=24828]Whilst searching for something else entirely, I happened upon this:
(My bold)
…despite EASPs still being current in ACP16, taught (as of April) in the ECOs course and clearly far more suitable for the task of running a deployed exercise, does this mean we should actually be using an EAM?[/quote]
Directly contradicts what I was told on Sunday…
Distinction seems to be that EAMs should be used for just individual lessons. EASPs for more complicated things.
Policy letter from TG5 - see the hyperlink in my original post.
[quote=“Gunner” post=24830]An EASP is if you’re running a full Ex (with or without) B&P whereas an EAM is more appropriate if you’re running a series of ‘stands’ or individual BE’s.[/quote]That was precisely my understanding - but the policy seems to disagree.
[quote=“Baldrick” post=24832][quote=“MattB” post=24828]Whilst searching for something else entirely, I happened upon this:
(My bold)
…despite EASPs still being current in ACP16, taught (as of April) in the ECOs course and clearly far more suitable for the task of running a deployed exercise, does this mean we should actually be using an EAM?[/quote]
Directly contradicts what I was told on Sunday…
Distinction seems to be that EAMs should be used for just individual lessons. EASPs for more complicated things.[/quote]
This is correct. The purpose of the EAM is so that, if you wanted to, you could go out on the training area and do a fieldcraft lesson without having to write a huge EASP which would be overkil. If you want to do an FTX without an EASP, I would imagine you could but would have to write a separate EAM for each section, which would obviously be a lot of duplication for a single exercise. It is almost like they don’t want you to do FTXs…