my understanding is that its officially verboten - there was a ‘shall not’ commandment - however the flip side was that the Sqn’s ignore it in order to do business (the commandment ignores the fact that DTE will only allow people wearing DPM/MTP to train on their land, and that the ACO requires CI’s to wear it for some range cources…). i imagine the only who-does-what is to what degree each wing ignores it on wing events, but it seems to me that WHQ’s turn a blind eye to what happens on the Sqn’s…
I believe the AP was written without the exceptions included on purpose. Currently officially CIs don’t wear greens except for Shooting courses when everyone is required to wear it. And road marching events when the unique dress regs which apply only to those events (which enable a myriad of weird uniform abominations to be worn) come into play.
Remember the eleventh commandment. Thou shalt not get caught.
[quote=“CSF” post=20402]Hello this is my first post.
Im soon to become a CI once i pass Board.
[/quote]
Missed this, due to all the camoflage…you’re being Wg boarded, as selection process to become a CI??
He’s probably referring to the board of an OC and a WSO which prospective CIs now have to go through before being appointed. Not quite a Wg board in the sense you mean.
Other places where CIs can wear uniform; either no2 or no3
CI can wear uniform in a band.
CI can wear uniform while marching in Nijmegen.
CI wear uniform while marching in the RAF 2 Day.
Sorry, perhaps my post wasn’t that clear. What I was asking was WHY are CIs supposed to (or entitled to) wear CS95/MTP on a SAAI course when they don’t wear it for anything else involving weapons?
[quote]para0221
Civilian Instructors Padres are not to wear CS95/PCS-MTP or any other DPM clothing. They are to wear appropriate / equivalent hard wearing civilian clothing
[/quote]
and so
[quote]para0222 CS95 Authorised Ensemble.
When authorised to wear and except where a specific order of dress has been prescribed through the OC Wg/Wg Ex O/Sqn Ldr CCF HQAC , only the approved CS95 ensemble, as detailed below, is to be worn [/quote]
which to me reads like there IS Wing discretion on how/when No3 uniform can be worn
and for reference
[quote] para 0223
Civilian Instructors attending Skill at Arms Instructor courses may wear CS95/PCS-MTP during training periods and ranges
only. It is not to be worn outside the training environment e.g. transit to and from messes and accommodation on Military units[/quote]
i find the the interesting part in that line is it indicates “SAAI Course…ranges”, in the weekends and i attended and others i know there was no range attendance as part of the SAAI course!
[quote=“steve679” post=20579]
following my SAAI course it is an “instructors uniform” to be wearing a smock and so incorporated into the SAAI training (delivery or receiving)[/quote]
But only for the SAAI course and not for weapon training for cadets, as per the wording of 0223. So CIs wear a CS95/MTP smock on the SAAI course but at no point afterwards once they have passed. Just seems very strange to me!
Ah yes, that old one. Utter polldarks.
We see that here a lot and one only needs common sense to see that it’s rubbish. However for some that’s not enough… JSP 886 is fairly prescriptive about what constitutes PPE, and standard combat uniform most certainly isn’t it!