The ASPIRE Team have just posted this agenda on social media from a meeting yesterday at HQAC. Topic for discussion between 0930-1000 was
“CONFIRMATION OF PROPOSED WG RE-STRUCTURE/DELEGATED AUTHORITY”
Are there big changes in the pipeline? Surely WG means Wing, or is it a Working Group?
WG with both letters in caps is an acronym and imo means Working Group. The correct abbreviation for Wing is Wg and isn’t something that would be discussed by ASPIRE
Have to say I concur.Mind I wouldnt be surprised if something did happen as the power brokers seem to have the bit between their teeth as regards changing things at the moment.
Somehow I don’t think 30 min would be enough to go through something like restructuring wings?
I would’ve thought WG is working group, but I don’t know, too many acronyms floating around
Why is there an actual note saying update twitter? Twitter feeds for the public services and military are the most embarrassing and cringeworthy things to see.
Concur - just look at the rest of the agenda for context. Clearly a meeting about D&I (or whatever today’s abbreviation is) in which command structures are unlikely to be discussed.
It’ll be a working group to ensure that any progress can be thwarted and jobs made safe, as the new/restructured working group will have to start again. ABRT or whatever it called now, is a prime example.
Mind you given how the Corps has worked 30 minutes for restructuring Wings seems ample time. Do it on the quick, put incoherent ramblings on social media, judge response, make it policy.
