the problem is Tony likes to talk inclusivity, opportunities for all etc but then gets scuppered by safeguarding, duty of care etc
So for all the talk of opening up opportunities we are actually doing the reverse and shutting down opportunities.
If you were born early enough in the academic year you can make the most of that last year at 6th form and being 18 before leaving for uni.
If your birthday is in 2nd half of year you have no chance.
(assumption that majority of 6th form leavers go to uni - I have no idea on the number of staff cadets in the org who have finished college and not left for uni but not sure it is a massive number)
The whole point of ACPS is for those with an âactive interest and passionâ for aviation and flying. If the requirement is to have all the knowledge before you go then you might as well just go with a civvy flying school and call it a day, itâs also thinking about costs on both the applicant and RAFAC, like you said extra rail warrants for RAFAC however if they arenât able to access these opportunities easily, thats just limiting the whole accessing opportunities thing HQ RAFAC is currently botching.
When you lay it all out like that, realistically itâll be single digit cadets wonât it. I suspect the % with Mummy or Daddy as a pilot starts to climb with all the extra barriers, itâs such a laborious task without someone to guide you through all that.
I think back to my squadron days, I had no idea anything like this existed, and I was the keenest of the keen. Let alone each of the hoops, of which all must be completed before being able to get onto ACPS.
The CBAT point you make is interesting. Hopes and dreams could well be crushed by failing the test, yet still be more than suited to commercial flying for example. Needs to be done in the wider context of promoting flying, not just to fill an extra F35 OCU slot in 2031.
My understanding is that cadet service only gives about 2 weeks advantage in Basic Training - marching, uniform upkeep and some degree of RAF kowledge.
The main benefit to the RAF of someone with, say, five years of committee cadet experience, is that they at least sort of know what theyâre getting themselves into.
Theyâre not just applying to go to Halton on a whim, Iâd wager theyâre more likely to stick the course at to the end. Total conjecture, but Iâd be surprised if thatâs not the case.
Thing is, anybody who does that is weeded out by the process these days. The application system takes over a year to get through (longer for Officer and direct SNCO roles); nobody doing it on a whim is putting up with that.
One of the few benefits of using civvy contractors!
Sadly this is often the case with a great deal of opportunities afforded to young people - everything from levels of attainment in education to sporting success
Apparently the new contract was offered to Tayside before they went bust. So them going bust means they had to offer it to the second choice, who then said they couldnât honour their quote.
TL;DR: We have no ACPS provider, and a new tendering process has begun. No ACPS until Jan 24.
Unfortunately, this has been due to the extraordinary circumstances involving the loss of our planned Service Provider.
Surely checking they werenât about to go bust was part of the procurement?
This actually an utter joke. Theyâre saying there likely wonât be any ACPS till Jan 24. Lets be realistic. Weâre looking at a good 12 months without any ACPS being offered.
Iâve got an awkward conversation to have with one of my cadets now. I suppose we could try to transfer her to an ATC unit to keep her place, but I fear sheâs too disillusioned by this point. ACLC cancelled when she was due to go, and now this. Sheâs already been quite angry by the lack of communications over this saga.
Iâd get my MP involved if she wasnât an utter chocolate teapot. Anyone know of a decent Lord?
Shows a fundamental misunderstanding of CCF(RAF). You have to be 18 to take up the spot. So almost inevitably the successful cadets will be upper 6, meaning they are to be discharged on or before 31/08/2023. There may have been some successful L6 who would take up the spot next academic year, but still in this financial year, but Iâve never yet heard of one being successful.
Iâd have thought MRAF Lord Stirrup would be your best bet, unless members know of someone with close links to RAFAC rather than just the parent service?
Edit: Another thought: are any of your school alumni in the House of Lords?