<\facetiousness>
Thereâs the cop out clause, âdoesnât generallyâ means rules can be altered to suit.
Bod or Bods?
Not bothered. They get paid handsomely for doing sod all.
I was reading CACâs Christmas message.
Something that has intrigued me is the call for getting more âvolunteersâ. Did the VA bring more losses than envisaged? If like our sqn and several others I know of, getting rid of people who no matter how many times you tell Wing and send them missives to the same, they just never went off the books, but they have now. This doesnât include those who said âscrew youâ when given a bit of paper to sign earlier in the year.
I was looking at the reports page and there doesnât seem to be a report relating to how many CFAV there are.
Or were before all this?
Iâm not sure there is a report for raw staff numbers as there is for cadets.
There will be, but not at our level of access.
Which makes no sense.
Never the less I imagine many would be interested to know the numbers just before and just after the cut off dates and computer runs.
I can think of at least 7 who would have been deleted from squadron staff counts.
I still havenât heard anything yetâŚ
I do rather wondering if I got culled before the date so that I didnât get counted as a stroppy protest.
Seems to be being implemented at RHQ level rather than HQ? Iâve seen different people report different actions.
I was told to do the non-attendance admin, that email was placed in the âurgent email to be ignoredâ file.
Seems that chart will make more interesting reading once the VA "sackings " kick into the stats.Unless of course they decide to suppress them of course.Mind the ACF figures look iffy (16.2% reduction.)
No I was looking at S/point reports which are supposedly live.
As @1993 says figures can be altered and I have little trust in the information theyâd allow. I suspect the losses from non-signers will expose a problem with adult staffing.
Update: Iâve not signed and nothing continues to happen about it.
iâve not signed it, and iâve had nothing through.
the caveat to that is that iâve not been down to the Squadron since christmas because the Sqn has stopped doing any of the things that interest me and that i might make any worthwhile contribution to - and its a loooooooooong way to another Sqn, and tbh i just canât be bothered but iâve still had nothing through.
OC is a massive emphasis though, and we donât like each other, so i donât expect him to act with any professionalism or courtesyâŚ
Iâve got a CI just sitting their who has left but not done paperwork so Iâm ignoring it and waiting to see if anything happens.
After so much bluff and bluster and the threatening language used by senior staff, this is another HQAC damp squib.
I lost a couple of staff off the list who had left and Wing etc couldnât get round to getting rid of.
Update: Nothing has happened