http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/dambusters-to-be-next-lightning-ii-squadron-18072013
Disband next year (boo) but then reform in 2016 as a Lightning 2 squadron.
I’ll miss the Tornado massively, but the photo at the top of the link is awesome!
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/dambusters-to-be-next-lightning-ii-squadron-18072013
Disband next year (boo) but then reform in 2016 as a Lightning 2 squadron.
I’ll miss the Tornado massively, but the photo at the top of the link is awesome!
Is it actually going to arrive by 2016…?
And RN… in an RAF squadron… “eww”
[quote=“Perry Mason” post=9356]Is it actually going to arrive by 2016…?
And RN… in an RAF squadron… “eww” ;)[/quote]
Joint Force Harrier (of which a lot of the Air Ranks were a part earlier in their careers) becomes Joint Force Lightning(II).
Lightning III surely?
I:
II:
III:
Ahhhh, yes, but not to the Americans. And besides, the P-38 was never operated by the RAF as the order was cancelled after the delivery of a couple of evaluation airframes IIRC.
It’s the second Lightning for each Air Force, hence Lightning II.
Why does it have to be called Lightning at all?
Historically aircraft carried different names in UK service, ie: Superfortress = Washington.
Then Rivet Joint will be Airseeker, and Grizzly will be Atlas.
I’m not sure about the Superfortress, but I suspect that we’re going for Airseeker because Rivet Joint is a truly terrible name.
Not that Airseeker is much better, mind. What happened to giving sensor/recce aircraft vaguely cool names beginning with S? Shadow, Sentry, Sentinel, S…?