http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/dambusters-to-be-next-lightning-ii-squadron-18072013
Disband next year (boo) but then reform in 2016 as a Lightning 2 squadron.
I’ll miss the Tornado massively, but the photo at the top of the link is awesome!
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/dambusters-to-be-next-lightning-ii-squadron-18072013
Disband next year (boo) but then reform in 2016 as a Lightning 2 squadron.
I’ll miss the Tornado massively, but the photo at the top of the link is awesome!
Is it actually going to arrive by 2016…?
And RN… in an RAF squadron… “eww” 
[quote=“Perry Mason” post=9356]Is it actually going to arrive by 2016…?
And RN… in an RAF squadron… “eww” ;)[/quote]
Joint Force Harrier (of which a lot of the Air Ranks were a part earlier in their careers) becomes Joint Force Lightning(II).
Lightning III surely?
I:

II:

III:

Ahhhh, yes, but not to the Americans. And besides, the P-38 was never operated by the RAF as the order was cancelled after the delivery of a couple of evaluation airframes IIRC. ![]()
It’s the second Lightning for each Air Force, hence Lightning II.
Why does it have to be called Lightning at all?
Historically aircraft carried different names in UK service, ie: Superfortress = Washington.
Then Rivet Joint will be Airseeker, and Grizzly will be Atlas.
I’m not sure about the Superfortress, but I suspect that we’re going for Airseeker because Rivet Joint is a truly terrible name.
Not that Airseeker is much better, mind. What happened to giving sensor/recce aircraft vaguely cool names beginning with S? Shadow, Sentry, Sentinel, S…?