The M word!

WRT Staff …
Staff morale has been getting lower for years (it’s not a recent phenomena) and it’s down to a multitude of factors.
I know of more people who have had more jobs in the last 10 years due to redundancy than they’d had in the previous 10-15 years, which puts more pressure on them to prove themselves in new jobs. There is more pressure from employers in terms of demands for working different hours. I know a lot more people now who are self-employed or work in a way that makes them effectively self-employed, which brings a whole different level of pressure and a lot more who do shift work, which only gives in essence 1 or part of a weekend a month off. They get time off during the week, but isn’t much use for those who are staff in the Corps, as all the activity courses are at the weekend.
Which means the ability or want to do other things diminishes.
I know of two staff who sent off their CRB and when they were told they were suspended as their CRB had ‘run out’ because it hadn’t reached Wing, they resigned on the spot, one of them put it in the post themselves and the other saw the adj do it on the way home. One told me I’d put so much into the organisation and if they can’t have a mechanism to deal with this, it’s not an organisation worthy of them.
Add into this the increased requirements from the Corps in terms of courses to do things, need to be qualified and then requalify a few years on in some cases and add in extra requirements such as WHTs, First Aid. The extra faff to do the most basic of things that didn’t exist years ago. All drain staff’s enthusiasm.
I was away last week and the older ones among us reflected on what we used to do, the actual work to say do a hiking weekend hasn’t altered and in fact being all on paper could be done anywhere without a need to be online. But the work to do visits and community events has increased as have FMS and shooting. I have passed organising things to other staff and they missed getting bits of paper from organisers or providers which just adds to the ‘fun’, especially as things like PLI are annual renewals.

I don’t think we should look at us as being unique in terms of morale, enthusiasm etc in the voluntary sector.
What we shouldn’t also ignore is that in society in general getting people to assist in a voluntary capacity has been getting harder and harder. For reasons stated above and people lacking what IMO is community spirit, which means more and more gets done by fewer willing people. Add into this the need to submit to checks if you want to do things with vulnerable groups. I know a lady who coordinates voluntary transport and she has said their pool of drivers has got smaller and new people are like hen’s teeth. A couple of people I know who are “Scout” leaders have said they used to rely on parents, but they aren’t so willing / keen to help as they once were. Even within RAFA and the RBL getting branch members to do their bit with a tin, it seems to be the older (least able) members who are most willing.

WRT Cadets …
I can quite accurately determine when it became more difficult to get cadets to do things … 1994, increasing from around 1999. 1994 was when Sunday trading laws were relaxed in England and Wales and many teenagers started working Saturdays and or Sundays and then a bit later on the supposed need to have to go to uni, which meant more teenagers doing weekend jobs, that could also mean some weekday evenings, to get a bit of money. Our kids started working at 16 at the weekend, which all but removed family life and an ability to do other things reduced. Our son was a keen footballer which all but stopped from when he started weekend working. I had a Saturday job which was working every other weekend in Woolies, as there were a lot wanting the job, so I all but stopped doing things on Saturdays and lost out on a GS. If I’d said I won’t be down for the next x Saturdays, I’d have been out of a job. You see it in older cadets now who can’t get the time off to do things (there are a good supply of teens wanting jobs than jobs and the retail sector is probably the least forgiving), when you combine it with education pressure home/course work exams and so on, it’s all you can do to expect them at the sqn. Also within education parents being unable to take holidays in term time means that school holidays (probably with the exception of the February ½ term) are now family holiday times. We always went on holiday for 2 weeks at the end of July before the schools broke up, can’t do that now. As mentioned I was away for a few days last week on DofE exped which had been opened to 3 sqns initially, but ended up with 7 to provide 12 cadets. Not that the original sqns didn’t have a need, but the cadets who needed to do it were on family holidays at one point it was touch and go if it was going ahead. Over the last 2 weeks we had two thirds of the cadets away and there are already 8 going away at Whitsun and 7 over the May Day weekend.

The biggest concern is that those in the Ivory Towers don’t seem to realise any of this, spinning as they do in their own little universe, oblivious to the real world. When the great and the good turn up somewhere and see lots of faces, they don’t realise what those attending might have had to do get there and that some will be going to work as soon as they’ve sodded off, with no thanks at all. When you consider cadets attending these things, how many will have given up a social life to do home/course work and or throw a sickie to attend the really, really important cadet activity? As long as those of us willing to sacrifice family and personal life and even duck/dive with our paid employment and cadets make sacrifices, continue to do so, nothing will change.

1 Like

Down to your friendly WSO…

RB - Any flying is greatly appreciated after the small ‘hiatus’ caused by the move. :slight_smile:

Small? What has been effectively a year if not longer is not small, when you consider the average life of a cadet. If a cadet does 18 months on average that’s 2/3 of their time in the Corps.

As I understand it, it’s one day a month, which when you consider how many sqns 5 AEF services, is all but pointless, given that when you get there dodgy weather or lack of pilots and or aircraft may mean sitting and travelling for nothing. We’d take it when offered, but given what happened just before and after the move to Wittering, I wouldn’t be counting chickens, until the cadets got into an a/c. Given the their track record I have a complete lack of trust in their ability to deliver and in any other instance I wouldn’t use them again. If you went to a business and they gave you a less than satisfactory service would you go back? I don’t. Just as well for them we have to put up with a poor service and take whatever they offer and be ever so grateful.

I think that your little rant apparently at me was a little unnecessary - I am very well aware of the problems, knowing several staff that work at 5 AEF. I don’t think that I made any suggestion that the service as currently seen was entirely acceptable to the customer.

I don’t think a suspension of more than a couple of weeks is small, when you are dealing with something as time-limited as youths in an organisation like ours.

There is an impression that in the run up to the move, people at Wyton dropped off the roster for some reason or other and then given the lack of service, lost interest or were unable to resume because of age limitations and there are too few willing or able to fill their boots. I have to say when I’ve been to Wyton the service was superb and the staff did everything to get cadets airborne. The whole move project like all MOD projects was managed extremely poorly to say the least.

Totally agree with this post.There seems to be a complete detachment from reality as regards HQAC these days.They dont seem to realise how hard it is for cadets and staff with the demands on their time. Im a shift worker so neatly fall into the trap of not being able to get to many things as most if not all courses are planned for weekends.I work two in three weekends so im pretty much stuffed.Id love to get my range qual back as my sqn needs more shooting but its a non starter as unlike the old days you dont just have to do that anymore its spread over at least two weekends and if you do the range qual then you have to do a weapons instructor course.Funny how we never needed those back in the day.You did the course were passed by the SATT and went and ran ranges and was rechecked every 4 yrs.How is it you can be qualified to run a range yet according to the powers that be you cant teach cadets about the weapon your using without taking yet another course. Then theres the coaching courses too.It all takes time which I havnt got and its very frustrating.For cadets and especially their parents education is all these days and cadets comes a poor second.I had one of my Cpls e mail me the other week and apologised he wouldnt be able to get in on a regular basis till after June due to exams.Even the younger ones seems to be just constantly doing exams.
Meanwhile in la la land the endless stream of prounouncements/demands keep on coming as if nothing has changed in the last 20 plus years.Before anyone says why dont I pack it in if I feel this way well thats simple because despite everything I still enjoy seeing cadets achieve things and having good experiences.However HQAC really needs to start to wake up and realise what is happening under their noses or a lot of people will start voting with their feet.

1 Like

Clearing up,a couple of points on the Wyton-Wittering move…

  1. Lack of aircraft: shouldn’t be a factor for weekend flying. Lack of aircraft duting the week may have been slightly compounded by having to move a second EFT squadron in due to demands of the incoming MFTS contract.

  2. No one involved in the move controls ATC manning. They do however have to comply with the MAA Regulation/TGOs etc (maybe even more so where Cadet flying is involved), and sadly the ATC operating model from Wyton could not be transferred directly. Just to add to the fun, the VCR is of course manned by Babcock. The RAF may or may not have as many qualified ATC personnel as it would like.

And finally:

  1. With a bit of patience you will have the best AEF facility anywhere in the country.

That said, if we hadn’t had 18-24 months of disruption due to the technical issues of having the change a prop (and the subsequent technical issues caused by changing the prop, and the priority given to service flying at Wyton/Cranwell/Barkston), and the concurrent gliding debacle, you wonder if people would think it was such a big deal given point 3 above.

[quote=“chaz, post:28, topic:2285, full:true”]
2) No one involved in the move controls ATC manning. They do however have to comply with the MAA Regulation/TGOs etc (maybe even more so where Cadet flying is involved), and sadly the ATC operating model from Wyton could not be transferred directly. Just to add to the fun, the VCR is of course manned by Babcock. The RAF may or may not have as many qualified ATC personnel as it would like.[/quote]
It was the way the whole project was mismanaged.
I can’t believe that as a stakeholder 5 AEF weren’t at the table when the move was being discussed initially.

I have no idea what people’s experience of project management (for want of a phrase) is, but when you do something ALL stakeholders should be present at the initial stages, where ALL requirements are outlined by email (increasingly) and or around the table. Whoever is running the project does a gap analysis and reports back so as to gain an idea of the importance of any gaps identified, in terms of continuity of delivery. This is addressed in the project management plan and the change deferred until the gap has been resolved. Having a situation where flying has been stopped and only just slightly changed is more evidence of the p!$$ poor project management ‘skills’ and protocols within the RAF/MOD, which I imagine is all about how many pips / how much braid you have and not ability to manage a project, as such a junior officer or OR with good project management skills would be the tea boy/girl, as anyone below OF6 is probably deemed as unable to manage a project.

Now when the move was first suggested someone should have recognised there was enough ATC cover for weekends to provide a continuity of service for AEF and that reported to HQAC and disseminated to squadrons affected. At what point was the gap in ATC cover identified? It seems not until 5 AEF had moved.

It is quite hilarious that HQAC rattles on about retention and just keeps loading more and more and more on staff in terms of compliance with things and to do the most mundane of things. Even if HQAC aren’t the arbiters of the change they should be representing the wider Corps’ best interests in terms of any negative impact on staff and cadets,

I found out last night that two of the bright young things (late 20s, early 30s) in the Wing have given their resignation forms to the Wg Cdr last week. Both have young families and do jobs that mean time away from home and odd working hours. It will interesting to see if someone tries to persuade them to stay.

The weekend ATC requirement was listed on the original “Statement of Intent.”

As of Nov 2015, there were at least 4 gapped posts at Wittering ATC, listed as a “funding measure.” At least of the of additional posts was made available by an FTRS position.

HQAC, regions and wings need to take a good hard look at them self and then for most start filling in the resignation paperwork!
Far to many of these idiots don’t know the reality or are so far removed from what goes on they no longer remember the basic aims of the ATC but instead are to busy finding people to blame for their failings.

the info I got back from a friend on the new look SCC just makes the whole thing a sham.
Firstly the SCC course is no longer to help you be a sqn commander but to assess you suitability to being a sqn Ldr.
There was lecture after lecture on policy and when asked for opinions it was made clear your opinion is not valid if it didn’t match theirs.
The CAC discussion made it pretty known she wants more from the staff. she was also pushing for… Having all ACO activities to be alcohol free for all staff, cutting the number of staff going to camps to make it leaner and better (well seen she’s never done a camp) and more LGBT interaction.
When they discussed the new flying training being pushed out where a cadet should only fly or glide once unless selected for a scholarship the response when someone stated that’s wromg was they can still do other activities such as first aid with the cadets
Sector shooting ranges were also briefly spoke about, but no real information given.

My own personal feeling is the ultimate goal for the ACO is a sqn with a staff of 1 officer, 1-2 NCOs and the rest CIs all other officers will be at wing level.

[quote=“MikeJenvey, post:31, topic:2285, full:true”]

The weekend ATC requirement was listed on the original “Statement of Intent.”[/quote]
What happened? Did they ignore it?

When we want to change how we do we things as a matter of courtesy we contact all of our customers to advise them. If they ask a question about delivery and we ignore it and delivery suffers our manager would be unimpressed and bang goes any bonus and maybe custom.

Unfortunately, the military has never had the capacity, wherewithal, or structure to match commercial enterprise. For example, at a well known RAF base where lots of private jets go, a new Ops bod (previously from the very quiet underground empire of the FC world) decided that these invasive jets made lots of noise with their APUs (little engine in the tail that powers/heats everything) whilst waiting for pax. So, the rule was imposed - you must use a gnd power unit (GPU) with a maximum time of use on the APU. Ah, taking into account the very limited number of GPUs & the number of aircraft requiring them at any one time (including military, this was going to be a big fail. And so it proved to be - the rule was soon rescinded. Customer service for a paid (expensive facility - using the airfield) was sub-optimal for a while.

For the Wittering issue, this was a “unit” move which linked to significant infrastructure (new buildings) & establishment issues for ATC = probably different funding/budgetary control/timescale & lead-in times. As we have seen, the knock-on effect of what should have been a simple proviso (ATC cover) led to a huge shortcoming in flying capacity.

Strange, i know someone who attended recently and they were raving about it having done their OSC (remember when it was called that?) a good many years ago.

The LGBT agenda isn’t something the ACO are pushing - you can see that from the MoD circulars that are being pushed around at the moment. The ACF and SSC are the same.

Seriously??
I think they are rushing out the equality/ inclusivity policies with out thinking about it carefully…

I think the rest is down to people’s impressions perhaps your contact was as mine put it a “nodding dog” and my contact was "an old fossil"
We may need another person to

Given my contact last did the course when it was called OSC and based at the DIOT i think they are pretty much an “old fossil”

Indeed. It’s a question of priority. At Cranwell after propgate there was a lack of weekday flying for cadets until those on high intervened - and that was without the faff of a move.

5AEF were always a stakeholder (under CUAS’ umbrella), but the fact is that, in a service where ATC personnel are a rare breed, you can’t just magic in and train controllers. Even given the notice of the move, the timescale to get approval and more importantly funding to recruit FTRS personnel has taken the time it has; they of course them have to apply (not a given) and be trained.

At the end of the day it was a choice full ATC cover during the week, with very limited weekend flying, or two days per week of full EFT flying with no radar cover (or extra burden on controllers at other sites). EFT wins (unfortunately). Compromises were made by all parties.

(And, as I’ve said, at the end of the day a year’s disruption is a fairly small price to pay for the long term future at an excellent site)

Not sure I’d agree with this… The content of the SCC was very much death by powerpoint, but it does effectively give you an overview of the entirety (almost) of the ACO’s activities. Now some feel that that’s unimportant for a Sqn Commander and more geared to someone with oversight, such as a WSO. However, one of the best tips I was ever given for being a Sqn Cdr (appeared on here some years back), was that you need to know something about everything and everything about something. And it’s absolutely true, your staff and cadets could come to you with an interest or question about any area of the ACO and expect you to give a reasonably knowledgeable reply, hence the SCC gives you that broad-brush detail.

Less staff at camps.Well ive seen a huge decrease in staff attending camps in the last 20 yrs.When I look back at say a camp photo from 2001 and one from 2014 theres a hell of a lot less staff about.As ever the corporate side is taking over again"leaner",“keener” all the usual buzz words.Next will be “blue sky thinking”.More like looking through rose tinted glasses to me.
As for LGBT agenda why does that have to be forced down peoples throats .Im sure we are all aware of the issue .