Gliding "paused"


#1767

Incorrect, diversion would not be necessary. The airfield would then become an unlicensed airfield and a light aircraft can use an unlicensed airfield. The restriction would be that on a public transport flight the aircraft cannot plan to take off and land at the same unlicensed airfield, but in this case the airfield was licensed at the time of take off.

The Tutor is a civil registered aircraft.


#1768

Again, incorrect.

All AEF pilots MUST be licensed in some way, either with a minimum of CPL or PPL.


#1769

Many AEF pilots do not hold a civil licence and there is no requirement whatsoever for them to do so, it is a military operated (albeit civil registered) aircraft on a military task / the pilot is acting in the course of his/her military duty.


#1770

Incorrect. There would no crash category and therefore as a military airfield operating within GASOs the aircraft would be diverting…

Unless someone submitted a risk assessment and has it approved within the sortie time (that wouldn’t happen).


#1771

As fascinating as this is, can we focus on the gliding pause and not the minute details of fire engines? Thanks


#1772

Very difficult to concentrate on gliding as there isn’t any!


#1773

The shambles of the destruction of the VGS system, the loss of core direction of the Corps and the RAF/MoD’s shocking inability to properly maintain a fleet of gliders and TMGs and even more shocking failure to recover them to service is one thing, however I think that its a bit much to start flaming AEFs for not flying because of a fault with a fire appliance. This is a completely unforseen circumstance and not flying is the correct thing to do IMO. More to the point, regardless of what I or others think and the semantics, the rules say no fire appliance = no fire cover = no flying.

Anyway, back on topic. What did everyone think of the House Of Lords statement on the ATC flying?


#1774

Indeed. If we didn’t talk/argue about something else it’d be very quiet in here!


#1775

Er no

Unless you are a serving military pilot you must have a ppl or CPL.

All of our pilots are licensed professional pilots bar 4. 1 has a ppl the others are serving


#1776

You could be an ex Vigilant A cat or B1 instructor without a CPL or PPL…!


#1777

Sorry but not the case. There are plenty of retired pilots, now VRT, with no civil licences at all. And ex VGS with no civil licences.


#1778

But all his holders of an RAF (or similar services’) Pilots’ brevet (or VGS equivalent) in accordance with whatever QR it is on their “wings” certificate.


#1779

Woop, everyone get their party hats out, our local fully operational VGS has issued our Wing with the 2018 Q1 allocation…

We got 16 places for our wing of circa 1000 cadets…

If only the definition of a fully operation VGS could match fully operational battle station … Grand Moff Tarkin for OC2FTS


#1780

HTF are they going to be dished out?

If I was on that Wing I’d arrange a mass email form all account holders, asking if they missed a zero off the end as a joke.

They could hold a raffle, charge a pound a strip and put the money to buying more gliders!!

Winners get to go along spend x hours getting there, spend an hour playing on a sim and then come home as the winch is broken, or, weather’s crap, or, none of the instructors are current, or, the winch is working but no one can operate it!!


#1781

Maybe your wings not the primary for that quarter?


#1782

Led to believe that this is going to be the regular allocation size moving forwards…

If only the new system was explained and the allocation process clear


#1783

Is that 16 Gliding Scholarships…?


#1784

Which wing is it?


#1785

No that is 16 cadet places to visit a VGS to complete some PTT & hopefully get some launches too, so hopefully Blue/Bronze Wings on offer

We are in SW Region


#1786

Ah I see those wings that are down at 16 did get a 50/50 split in the last quarter, now there are two new wings joining the party along with the CCF.