Gliding "paused"


#1667

Nothing to do with experience in the area, it’s rattling cages which any decent manager should do.

I do wonder what experience (outside of social media) can be evidenced.


#1668

And I’m sure she does rattle cages, but to a degree she is reliant upon what she’s told. The captain of the ship doesn’t necessarily know how to do all the crews jobs.
Cmdt 2FTS is also accountable to OC 22Gp, a factor that has big influence on what decisions are made. Delivery is very much driven by the Royal Air Force.


#1669

Experience in the relevant area - must check the RAF’s OOB - can’t seem to find the glider sqns there… :wink:


#1670

Aviation Studies
Without wishing to add fuel to the fire did anyone else see this on the 2FTS Nov 17 Newsletter:

AVIATION STUDIES
There are two planned studies looking to the future of aviation to be chaired by Commandant Cranwell, Air Cdre Squires. The first is looking into air safety and optimisation of No.’s 2, 3 & 6 FTS. The second study is to look at Aviation for UAS and Air Cadets in the future. Once these have been complete details will be posted.


#1671

Translation: Simulators only from henceforth


#1672

Wouldn’t it be a good idea if Comdt Air Cadets was a regular serving aircrew role? Oh, wait a sec…


#1673

Maybe not, but a good captain would have bloody good idea of what people do and how one bit not working properly affects the whole thing, as they would have had several years in junior roles learning.
Most of our managers at work have been around for years in various roles.
Headmasters and headmistresses in schools would have been bog standard teachers and then had several years of being in different areas of responsibility, before becoming a headmaster/mistress.

The problem with our Commandants (inc Region) is they are parachuted into the job after being in the RAF in any job and they have a less than zero understanding of how the Corps operates. They may have been king pins in their RAF bubble but in the ATC as far as I’m concerned they are no more than new bloke / woman off the street CI, in terms of their actual understanding of the Corps. In the past it wasn’t much of a problem, but the last 2 especially have got too involved and fiddled too much, plus we seem to have spawned jobs/roles that we need less than syphilis.


#1674

The captain needs to have a good understanding of what and whom he/she is in charge of. It’s clear that that is not the case in many areas of the ATC, especially with regards to gliding.

Whenever I read about “Optimisation”, “Studies in to the future” and other related buzzwords/phrases, I feel a shudder, because inevitably its going to be enforcing some form of unwelcome and unwanted change that will see everyone lose out. Perhaps an admission that with respect to flying activity things have been completely and utterly screwed up beyond any repair and the best our kids can look forward to is a couple of sessions flying a flight sim every year and the very occasional trip in a real aeroplane for 20 minutes?

I hate being so cynical.


#1675

The buzz phrases are what some people get up in the morning for. I work about 10 yards from 3 people who live life in a fug buzz phrases.

In my experience of work, any meeting where something containing “reorganisation” , “optimisation”, “study” etc in the title, etc are never ever positive unless you are well above it’s sphere of influence.

We’ve had too many of these in the Corps over the years and they have produced absolutely zip in terms of positivity for the cadets and volunteers.


#1676

Well, the UAS’ have seen a massive push towards the ‘force protection’ type of activity in recent years, so they can do away with flying without much drama. That’ll save some cash. They can go play in the mud with the OTCs instead. Or they’ll do away with individual service clubs and just follow the DTUS trend. Purple units.

With no UAS’ flying they’ll be, by default, no aviation units for the air cadets, so tough excrement!

However, and this will be a comment that will cause a reaction… So what? I didn’t particularly enjoy flying as a cadet. I’d avoid it if I could. I was never going to fly professionally (bad eyes, hayfever, etc) so didn’t want to waste my time. So I did other things.

Didn’t hurt me. Still joined the UAS. Still joined the RAF.

Flying isn’t the be all and end all. We can’t keep presenting the air cadets as a “we fly!!!” organisation, then squabbles like this won’t rile as many people.


#1677

Eh?

If we don’t promote flying (ATC’s USP - why we exist) we are as well giving up.

Are you high up in 2FTS/HQAC by any chance?


#1678

Air power is all about the employment of air systems for military effect - everything else is in support of that aim. Appreciating and experiencing the air environment and building air mindedness from day one is the vital difference about an Air Force - IMHO we will never step away from light aircraft flying in the foreseeable future for that. The UASs are well above their recruitment targets and with the current drive to recognise / promote Modular training I think the UAS position is stronger than ever before. That is a good news story for cadet aviation!


#1679

There’s a difference between promoting it and suggesting that’s the only thing that makes us good.

And, as this thread has pointed out on multiple occasions, we’re not doing much of it already…

It’s not the too distant future when aircraft in the RAF won’t have pilots on board, so is actually having time flying ‘for real’ going to be that important?..


#1680

[quote=“Teflon, post:1528, topic:1152, full:true”] Based on that cost point and say 40000 cadets you could give each cadet a 30 minute flight for £3.4 million, no on costs for maintenance etc,
[/quote]

I’m sure even someone would end up paying a little bit more for the extra 20000 hours, and the maintenance required, on the GA fleet around the country. How often does a GA aircraft need checks and servicing? Even across 20 locations that’s a fair bit of extra work even on far fewer numbers.


#1681

Not strictly true for the current incumbent as she is also ex VRT (albeit briefly) as is RC SNI.


#1682

All through my time in the organisation, over 40 years, we have always had a good number come in from “scouting” and some come across from the ACF and this is changing. I’ve had Scouts come along to intakes in recent years and keep a foot in both camps and then leave the ATC, as we are no different to Scouts, bar the rules we play by, which are no real attraction.

So we need real flying to give us something to make us distinct from Scouts and ACF and not continue as some chimera.


#1683

What we need and what we’ll get are two different concepts.


#1684

Hopefully it’s understood I’m playing the ball here and not the player, I get pretty emotive about this subject; however there is a very obvious and key reason why we are called the “AIR Training Corps” and we have the “Royal AIR Force”. Aviation is our raison d’etre, take that element away and what differentiates us from Scouts, ACF etc.?

Pilotless technology is still very much in its infancy, despite drone use increasing rapidly IMO the spread of machines taking over everything is rather overstated. Pilots will still be around for quite a while yet. By your logic everything is getting automated, so we should give up doing everything because it appears computers are going to do it all for us. So what do we all do? Do we stop shooting, because robots will do that for us, or cyber warfare will make weapons obsolete? Do we give up learning to drive, because the machines will do it themselves? Do we give up adventure training, because we can stick on some VR goggles and be anywhere we like? Devil’s advocate, like I say playing the ball not the player.


#1685

I agree!


#1686

Completely understood, but some try hard, bright spark in the House of Commons is going to ask “why spend all this money on training aircraft for cadets when more and more training for ‘the actual RAF’ is done on simulators?”.

We need a better answer than “waaah, we’ve always done it that way, give us back our toys”.