At the risk of thread drift, this is one of the biggest drawbacks of the O18 policy as it now stands. Previously I could have had a staff cadet as an assistant but still count for ratios on FT, Or in my AOR, to teach.
Now I need CFAV to meet the ratios meaning that if staff cadets are teaching the CFAV are more or less surplus to requirements, except for ratios. Or theyāre teaching in which case we donāt need the staff cadets!
So in one sentence you say you have years of experience and then the next say you donāt know the policy and donāt have a copy of itā¦
If you have issues with how itās written then feed it back using the CoC or if itās issues with the document then there is a military skills feedback form.
The policy goes via several different levels of review including socialisation with Regions and Wings prior to release.
There is about to be another review so if there are any changes that are required then now is the time to raise them.
The last Bronze FC I was involved in, had some lessons, such as obstacle crossing and cam & concealment delivered by FTI(R)s (a CFAV and a JL cadet) but a full FTI was supervising. I believe the ACP allows this and gave the small team of FTIs a break from actively delivering.
With a quick refresher session, they could easily exercise the āplanning and conductā element and be appointed as Activity Owner. Itās an opportunity to further invest in our cadets and to take advantage of their relative enthusiasm and availability of time. Assuming they stay as CFAVs, they will be more experienced in instruction, and it means they get qualified before life becomes more complex with uni / first jobs / relationships / children. That translates to more time instructing, giving greater delivery capacity. It is also a light way to start that transition to being a staff member, and is likely of value to the cadet in terms of life experience ⦠think of those job interview competency-based questions and how they might be able to talk about āresponsibilityā, coaching, time management, etc., questions more confidently and in a way that stands out. DofE is wonderful, but this is more differential. Itās also of relevance to our parent Service and other Services, giving an advantage to both the cadet, as a prospective recruit, and to the Service in de-risking recruitment and training.