FAA grounds 171 Boeing planes after mid-air blowout

I wasnā€™t going to post about todayā€™s incident on this thread, given that itā€™s being reported as turbulence. However, a line caught my eye in one of the reports:

"ā€¦a bit of turbulence and suddenly the plane plunged,ā€ Source: Singapore Airlines flight live: British man, 73, dies during severe turbulence on London-Singapore flight - BBC News

Which reminded me of another incident, not that long ago on the same aircraft type (B777):

Could todayā€™s incident be akin to the Latam flight in March this year, that was caused by a ā€œtechnical incidentā€ (although this was a B787)?

Also really looking forward to my flight on a 777 in a couple of weeks nowā€¦

Edit: including link to the FR24 playback of the flight. Incident occurred around 0748 UTC: 9V-SWM - Boeing 777-312(ER) - Singapore Airlines - Flightradar24

Cross-Atlantic - lots of jet streams!

You can have look at relevant charts, you might need to look up for the decode for the met symbols for wind strength / turbulence.

Fame at last. :wink:

2 Likes

its behind a pay wallā€¦=(

One slightly more ā€œobviousā€ comment - but it was linked to more detail on my original write-up.

A few more scattered around. :wink:

I always have my seat bet done up when flying. It only comes off when it is time for a visit to the WC.

3 Likes

Safest thing to do - looking at the numbr of injured people on the flight, itā€™s probably safe to say that for those who were in their seat, they didnā€™t!

For a day time long haul flight as a pax, I will always look at the aviation turbulence forecast & correlate it with the expected route / approximate timings to hit any turbulence areas. Been more than several times when Iā€™ve "planned " my WC break on my look at the forecast, & have been back in seat (all strapped in) about 10-15 mins before moderate turbulence was encountered - no prior warning / anticipation from the flight deck by putting on the seat belt signs / giving a PA to pax. Thatā€™s not very professional, especially as the ā€œoperational flight planā€ should show predicted wind shear figures. No good for the cabin crew either, as they might be out on a service, with heavy lumps of metal (trollies) that canā€™t be secured when in the cabin.

Not so hot on looking at forecast for any red-eye flights, as hopefully Iā€™m watching a movie or trying to sleep!

When operating on long flights, especially over the Atlantic or other ā€œhot spotsā€ for turbulence (jet stream or mountain wave related), we would always listen out (or ask) for ā€œride reportsā€ from aircraft ahead, & if necessary anticipate the turbulence by flying at best turbulence speed (halfway between max & min buffet speeds), pre-warning flight attendant / pax & plonking on the seat belt sign.

That was an interesting read/look, thanks for sharing - I actually wasnā€™t aware of the volcanic eruption south of Lima, although I donā€™t think my flight path goes particularly close to it anyhow.

I canā€™t quite recall if Iā€™m heading over in the wet or dry season for South American (although where Iā€™m actually going to be based is desert anyhow), so could be fun heading over the top of the Amazon Rainforest if it is wet season, given Iā€™ll be over that area around midday local time.

Tim Clark of Emirates commenting on Boeing and their ā€˜cultureā€™.