Sorry - I know I wrote a long winded reply earlier - but frankly I could feel my blood pressure rocketing…
What I wanted to also add, was the enormous sense of “ownership, pride, responsibility and guilt” felt by everyone involved in face to face roles with cadets and staff…
While I’ve encountered many “over enthusiastic” individuals, I don’t think I’ve ever encountered any “foolish” or “apathetic” when it comes to delivering activity.
Discussing my views with a well regarded Squadron Leader, they posited that activities could follow the Safe Delivery Standards that are in place for shooting for example…
ie - This IS how the delivery WILL be delivered… and in which case, this is the standard form AND standard Risk Assessments (produced centrally by professionals!)
But - allow for a degree of flexibility by allowing bespoke paperwork to be created - but this would involve everything having to be prepared, agreed and approved etc - and therefore take more time to produce and process…
I mentioned “guilt”, because this is also felt in abundance by lots of people I’ve spoken to - from guilt over not doing more for cadets and their colleagues - but guilt for not doing more at home… to guilt at not maintaining their own health… it goes on and on…
It’s because CFAVs want to do more, be more dynamic, change more lives… that they feel this guilt.
RAFAC is a hobby for the majority, it’s something that should bring enjoyment, satisfaction, empowerment and pride.
There’s too much emphasis by HQAC on CFAVs to be viewed as unpaid employees - rather than invaluable volunteers.
I recognise the conflation between a voluntary organisation and the uniformed organisation of which we’re related to - but there’s a disconnect between rank, seniority and importance….
In any other situation where there is a customer / provider relationship, THE most important person is the customer - the cadets, their families and the local community; the NEXT most important are the instructors / staff… then the CO… then Sector Cdr, WSO etc…
Rather than the hierarchy above the Sqn doing all they can to support the individuals - we are all aware of the repeated obstacles that are being put in the way of volunteers - as though they are hell bent on dis-incentivising on purpose!
As for TK staying on…?
My understanding is that he’s undertaken to hang around for up to 6 months to help support the new CAC - “to enable a smoother transition” - as opposed to “let the new person do their own thing…”
Remember what I said about “control freaks”?